The implementation of the program, and the evaluation of it, then tests those hypotheses. A particular type of case study used to jointly develop an agreed narrative of how an innovation was developed, including key contributors and processes, to inform future innovation efforts. (2008). 189–190; Hammersley, 1998, p. 3; Suppe, 1977, p. 618); realism has been prominent in other areas of philosophy as well (Miller, 2010). Among the realist evaluation community, there is heated debate about whether randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are a credible method for understanding complex interventions . G. Hewitt, S. Sims, R. Harris; Medicine; 1 May 2012; Background: The realist approach is a form of theory-driven evaluation developed to strengthen the explanatory power of evaluation studies and contribute to … Appendix II – ‘Varieties of realist evaluation’: pocket illustrations of quantitative, qualitative, formative and synthetic applications. In healthcare change interventions, on-the-ground learning about the implementation process is often lost because of a primary focus on outcome improvements. A strengths-based approach designed to support ongoing learning and adaptation by identifying and investigating outlier examples of good practice and ways of increasing their frequency. Its overall place in the toolkit of evaluation approaches is not yet fully established. It provides an explanatory analysis aimed at discerning what works for whom, in what circumstances, in what respects and how. Realist review is part of a wider family of ‘theory driven’ approaches to evaluation. This technique assumes that knowledge is a social and … Develop programme theory/theory of change, 5. A Realist Approach to Qualitative Data Analysis: Interviews With Indigenous Patients With Cancer; Epistemology and Metaphysics for Qualitative Research; Researching Social Exclusion & Vulnerability Using Realist Methods; An Introduction to Critical Management Research; An Introduction to the Philosophy of Methodology Powered By Scopus® Data. An approach especially to impact evaluation which examines what works for whom in what circumstances through what causal mechanisms, including changes in the reasoning and resources of participants. This philosophy is based on the assumption of a scientific approach to the development of knowledge. Login Login and comment as BetterEvaluation member or simply fill out the fields below. A realist evaluation provides an account of how aspects of and combinations of context and mechanisms interact to influence outcomes. There are few published examples of realist synthesis. evaluation approaches may not be feasible, with the broader aim of identifying lessons with wider application potential. 3)Interventions (and research) are ‘theory incarnate’ 4)All (social) systems are open, yet context matters in every explanation. The designers of realist evaluations have developed some key assumptions, based on this philosophy. It describes five key ideas which frame realism and their implications for impact evaluation. Introduction: Realist evaluation is an increasingly popular methodology in health services research. Realist evaluations attempt to answer questions such as what works, for whom, in which circumstances, and why. 11 We describe an approach to considering these … The Success Case Method (SCM) involves identifying the most and least successful cases in a program and examining them in detail. Realist approaches to evaluation assume that nothing works everywhere or for everyone: context really does make a difference to programme outcomes. Realist Evaluation. This approach was developed by Robert Brinkerhoff to assess the impact of organisational interventions, such as training and coaching, though the use of SCM is not limited to this context. Realist research approaches • Realist evaluation = primary research • Realist review / synthesis = secondary research • Both approaches: – have more of an explanatory rather than judgmental focus. Realism can be divided into two groups: direct and critical. Thus realism does involve being realistic. An approach designed to support ongoing learning and adaptation, which identifies the processes required to achieve desired results, and then observes whether those processes take place, and how. In this workshop, participants will explore the advantage of using realist methodology to go beyond the question of ‘did an intervention work or not?’ to addressing questions about how, for whom, and under what circumstances interventions produce their particular outcomes. Realist approaches are a form of theory-driven evaluation which search for and refine explanations of programme effectiveness, however, several realist studies have been identified which lack this essential process (Pawson and Manzano-Santaella, 2012). An impact evaluation approach which unpacks  an initiative’s theory of change, provides a framework to collect data on immediate, basic changes that lead to longer, more transformative change, and allows for the plausible assessment of the initiative’s contribution to results via ‘boundary partners’. This paper offers a model of research synthesis which is designed to work with complex social interventions or programmes, and which is based on the emerging 'realist' approach to evaluation. Data were collected through a national scoping and survey, and qualitative methods to track patient and public involvement processes and impact over time within 22 nationally funded research projects. Realist evaluation is a type of theory-driven evaluation method used in evaluating social programmes. An approach designed to support ongoing learning and adaptation, through iterative, embedded evaluation. Improving skills and care standards in the support workforce for older people: a realist synthesis of workforce development interventions. The introduction to the chapter covers ontology as it relates to research methods. Evaluation has become progressively popular within public health and healthcare programme research, with an emphasis on outcomes and … I have read and I accept the terms of BetterEvaluation’s. NCBI Bookshelf. This means collecting data, not just about program impacts, or the processes of program implementation, but about the specific aspects of program context that might impact on program outcomes, and about the specific mechanisms that might be creating change." Aarons et al argue for ‘borrowing strength’ from evidence from earlier outcome evaluations to allow for evaluation in a new setting to focus on process rather than outcomes, but do not provide detail of how such decisions can be made beyond the assessment of similarity of population and intervention mechanisms in the new context. Genevieve Coorey, David Peiris, Lis Neubeck, Julie Redfern, A realist evaluation approach to explaining the role of context in the impact of a complex eHealth intervention for improving prevention of cardiovascular disease, BMC Health Services Research, 10.1186/s12913-020-05597-5, 20, 1, (2020). Combining qualitative and quantitative data, 1. Realist evaluation is a type of theory-driven evaluation method used in evaluating social programmes. For example, 'Randomized Controlled Trials' (RCTs) use a combination of the options random sampling, control group and standardised indicators and measures. Introduction. An impact evaluation approach based on contribution analysis, with the addition of processes for expert review and community review of evidence and conclusions. It describes five key ideas which frame realism and their implications for impact evaluation. Approach to this process evaluation. Decide who will conduct the evaluation, 5. Genevieve Coorey, David Peiris, Lis Neubeck, Julie Redfern, A realist evaluation approach to explaining the role of context in the impact of a complex eHealth intervention for improving prevention of cardiovascular disease, BMC Health Services Research, 10.1186/s12913-020-05597-5, 20, 1, (2020). Document management processes and agreements, 7. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. An approach to decision-making in evaluation that involves identifying the primary intended users and uses of an evaluation and then making all decisions in terms of the evaluation design and plan with reference to these. Synthesise data from a single evaluation, The nature of programmes and how they work, Basic concepts in the explanation and understanding of programmes, Strategies and methods of realist evaluation, Realism’s place in the policy cycle: formative, summative and synthetic approaches, The nature, presentation and use of findings from realist evaluation, Conclusion: strengths, limitations and relationships with other approaches. Strategies and methods of realist evaluation 4. Basic concepts in the explanation and understanding of programmes 3. This can be in a narrative form or expressed as ‘CMO’ equations, which describe the Context and Mechanisms that can lead to wanted Outcomes. Introduction 1. Abstract Background: The realist approach is a form of theory-driven evaluation developed to strengthen the explanatory power of evaluation studies and contribute to evidence-based policy and practice. Applying a realist(ic) framework to the evaluation of a new model of emergency department based mental health nursing practice. A range of approaches that engage stakeholders (especially intended beneficiaries) in conducting the evaluation and/or making decisions about the evaluation​. They are It explains when a realist impact evaluation may be most appropriate and outlines how to design and conduct an impact evaluation based on a realist approach. It is a generic approach that can be applied to many fields of research, including health and social care. – based on a realist philosophy of science (ontology) – looks for mechanisms and middle-range theories. Traditional evaluation efforts that focus on aggregate effectiveness represent an oversimplification of both the environment and the interventions themselves. approach for over 30 years (Baert, 1998, pp. Rycroft-Malone J, Burton CR, Williams L, et al. An impact evaluation approach that iteratively maps available evidence against a theory of change, then identifies and addresses challenges to causal inference. 1 Older people are the main recipients of care in the National Health Service (NHS), and older people's care costs the UK NHS relatively more than those of working age. As realist approaches gain momentum in the evaluation of complex social programmes and interventions, attention is turning to how other approaches can complement realist … A research design that focuses on understanding a unit (person, site or project) in its context, which can use a combination of qualitative and quantitative data. Realist evaluation is a valuable method for addressing the complexity of social programmes. Resources list on 'realist' evaluation . That is, whenever a program is implemented, it is testing a theory about what ‘might cause change’, even though that theory may not be explicit. Realist approaches to evaluation assume that nothing works everywhere or for everyone: context really does make a difference to programme outcomes. Cited 9 times in Google Scholar. "A realist approach assumes that programs are “theories incarnate”. Realism is an approach to humanity which recognizes the real existence of social objects as well as physical objects. The second section of the review introduces retroduction, a major methodological starting-point common to most realists. Participants were 20 interdisciplinary staff nominating as CoP members between Nov 2013-Nov 2015 representing 13 facilities (approximately 780 beds) of a RAC organisation. The use of simulation-based education (SBE) is increasing and so too is the evidence supporting its value as a powerful technique which can lead to substantial educational benefits. Cutting nature at its seams. The UK population is getting older—by 2031 it is estimated that one in five people will be over 65 years old. This introduction aims to explain realist impact evaluation for those unfamiliar with its principles. principles of realist methodology I have discussed today remain: 1)Both the material and social world are real. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it Realist evaluations are based on a particular philosophy (realism). Background. It is based on the epistemological foundations of critical realism. This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Realist researchers then try to articulate the theories (termed 'mechanisms') that underpin the programme and explore how contexts influence the mechanisms to produce different programme outcomes. It explains when a realist impact evaluation may be most It is a generic approach that can be applied to many fields of research, including health and social care. Medical Education 2012, 46:1, 89–96 • Klee R. Introduction to the philosophy of science. Realist evaluation: an introduction Realist evaluation is a theory-driven approach to evaluating evidence from complex interventions. Define ethical and quality evaluation standards, 6. An approach that focuses on assessing the value of an intervention as perceived by the (intended) beneficiaries, thereby aiming to give voice to their priorities and concerns. It is a useful approach to document stories of impact and to develop an understanding of the factors that enhance or impede impact. One of the tasks of a realist evaluation is therefore to make the theories within a program explicit, by developing clear hypotheses about how, and for whom, programs might ‘work’. Brief introduction to realist evaluation. It gives a brief introduction to the philosophical assumptions underlying realist methods and outlines key principles of realist evaluation (designed for empirical studies) and realist review (the application of realist methods to secondary research). Resources list on 'realist' evaluation . Check the results are consistent with causal contribution, 3. Introduction. An impact evaluation approach suitable for retrospectively identifying emergent impacts by collecting evidence of what has changed  and, then, working backwards, determining whether and how an intervention has contributed to these changes. 2)All scientific enquiry is mediated by humans—there is no such thing as final truth or knowledge. Introduction to Evaluation Evaluation utilizes many of the same methodologies used in traditional social research, but because evaluation takes place within a political and organizational context, it requires group skills, management ability, political dexterity, sensitivity to multiple stakeholders and other skills that social research in general does not rely on as much. This paper introduces the realist approach and explains why it is particularly suited to education research. This thesis is a report of a theory driven study designed to evaluate the role of the 'intermediary' in promoting best practice in infection prevention and control. • Realist evaluation = primary research • Realist synthesis = secondary research • Both methods: – have more of an explanatory rather than judgmental focus. Doing Realist Research combines the foundations of the realist methodology with the very latest thinking in the application, and development, of the approach.From understanding mechanisms, and the formulation of programme theories, to understanding the role of … • Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Pawson R. Realist methods in medical education research: what are they and what can they contribute? The realist approach is a form of theory-driven evaluation developed to strengthen the explanatory power of evaluation studies and contribute to evidence-based policy and practice. Complex interventions ... drawing on realist approaches to evaluation and suggesting what sorts of evidence and information local decision-makers need to draw on. A convergent, parallel mixed methods evaluation design based on a realist approach using surveys, audits, observations and semi-structured interviews. – based on a realist philosophy of science (ontology) – look to answer the ‘How?’, ‘Why?’, ‘For whom?’, ‘To Define ethical and quality evaluation standards, Document management processes and agreements, Develop planning documents for the evaluation or M&E system, Develop programme theory / theory of change, activities, outcomes, impacts and context, Combine qualitative and quantitative data, Check the results are consistent with causal contribution, Investigate possible alternative explanations, Sustained and emerging impacts evaluation (SEIE), Technology and evaluation in insecure settings, Evaluation practice in Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander settings, http://www.communitymatters.com.au/gpage1.html, 3. Realist evaluation using Normalization Process Theory as a programme theory to understand what enabled patient and public involvement to be embedded as normal practice. Applying a realist(ic) framework to the evaluation of a new model of emergency department based mental health nursing practice. Evaluation research is tortured by time constraints. Realist impact evaluation draws on the realism school of philosophy. An impact evaluation approach that compares results between a randomly assigned control group and experimental group or groups to produce an estimate of the mean net impact of an intervention. Investigate possible alternative explanations, 1. Realist evaluation is a valuable method for addressing the complexity of social programmes. For realist evaluations (RE) this project aims to: develop quality and reporting standards and training materials; build capacity for undertaking and critically evaluating them; produce resources and training materials for lay participants, and those seeking to involve them. We are a global collaboration aimed at improving evaluation practice and theory through co-creation, curation, and sharing information. Learning Evaluation is an approach to multi … For realist evaluations (RE) this project aims to: develop quality and reporting standards and training materials; build capacity for undertaking and critically evaluating them; produce resources and training materials for lay participants, and those seeking to involve them. This web page from Community Matters provides a brief introduction to realist evaluation along with the a chapter by Ray Pawson and Nick Tilley that provides discussion of the basic concepts , strategies and methods of realist evaluation. Approaches (on this site) refer to an integrated package of options (methods or processes). Realist evaluations are based on an assumption that projects and programmes work under certain conditions and are influenced by the way that different stakeholders respond to them. Appendix I – ‘Thinking it through’: an exercise in realist hypothesis making. But more importantly, it asserts that the things we are studying in social research have some prior existence and would continue to exist even if our knowledge of them was limited. evaluation approaches may not be feasible, with the broader aim of identifying lessons with wider application potential. Realist impact evaluation is an approach to impact evaluation that emphasises the importance of context for programme outcomes. Drawing on our own experiences, we make the case that, used in conjunction with a realist approach, Soft Systems Methodology can provide a useful tool to a) map programme complexity, and b) develop and refine stakeholders programme theories, thus increasing the transparency, reliability, validity and accuracy of the theory building and refining process in realist approaches. This introduction aims to explain realist impact evaluation for those unfamiliar with its principles. It describes how the realist researcher evaluates complex social interventions not by asking whether a particular programme or intervention 'works', but, recognising that all interventions only ever work for certain people in certain circumstances, by asking instead 'what works for whom in what circumstances'? Realist evaluation is a theory-driven approach to evaluating evidence from complex interventions. There are ongoing philosophical debates over realism that remain unre-solved, and realist philosophers themselves disagree about many of these issues; A way to jointly develop an agreed narrative of how an innovation was developed, including key contributors and processes, to inform future innovation efforts. INTRODUCTION. View in Google Scholar, Cited 24 times in Scopus. Approach primarily intended to clarify differences in values among stakeholders by collecting and collectively analysing personal accounts of change. Introduction. Tweets by @BetterEval !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)? Doing Realist Research combines the foundations of the realist methodology with the very latest thinking in the application, and development, of the approach.From understanding mechanisms, and the formulation of programme theories, to understanding the role of … Realism’s place in the policy cycle: formative, summative and synthetic approaches 5. The realist evaluation approach was first developed by Pawson and Tilley (1997) and has since been adapted in many different ways. Direct realism, also known as naive realism, can be described as “what you see is what you get”[1]. The third section reviews concretely the realist debate over statistics and some realist contributions to qualitative methodology, qualitative A Realist Approach to Qualitative Data Analysis: Interviews With Indigenous Patients With Cancer; Epistemology and Metaphysics for Qualitative Research; Researching Social Exclusion & Vulnerability Using Realist Methods; An Introduction to Critical Management Research; An Introduction to the Philosophy of Methodology A stakeholder involvement approach designed to provide groups with the tools and knowledge they need to monitor and evaluate their own performance and accomplish their goals. That is, whenever a program is implemented, it is testing a theory about what ‘might cause change’, even though that theory may not … This article describes the key features of realist (realistic) evaluation and illustrates their application using, as an example, a simulation-based course for final year medical students. A strengths-based approach to learning and improvement that involves intended evaluation users in identifying ‘outliers’ – those with exceptionally good outcomes - and understanding how they have achieved these. This introduction aims to explain realist impact evaluation for those unfamiliar with its principles. While we do not seek to replicate this debate here, we acknowledge the possibility of using a critical realist approach to understand the outcomes of an RCT in primary care. Key words: Realist evaluation, Realist Syntheses, Soft Systems Methodology, Stakeholders, Systems Thinking. Realist synthesis is an increasingly popular approach to the review and synthesis of evidence, which focuses on understanding the mechanisms by which an intervention works (or not). Appendix III – ‘Would it work here?’: a grid to help decide on the feasibility of mounting a programme ‘on your patch’. Background: The realist approach is a form of theory-driven evaluation developed to strengthen the explanatory power of evaluation studies and contribute to evidence-based policy and practice. REALIST . There are currently no comments. Thus realism does involve being realistic. An approach used to surface, elaborate, and critically consider the options and implications of boundary judgments, that is, the ways in which people/groups decide what is relevant to what is being evaluated. ), 2 “ theories incarnate ” that blends quality improvement and implementation methods! 24 times in Scopus application potential as health services research evaluation draws on the assumption of new! Evaluation draws on the realism school of philosophy, Burton CR, Williams L et! Concepts in the explanation generation is based on a realist synthesis kept and. Complexity of social programmes lens to empiricist the realist approach to evaluation research:an introduction techniques for the study and of... Everyone: context really does make a difference to programme outcomes: formative, summative and synthetic applications impact. The environment and the evaluation and/or making decisions about the evaluation​ are Applying a realist synthesis reality from human. Be feasible, with the addition of processes for expert review and community review of evidence and information decision-makers. Article introduces the reader to the realist approach assumes that programs are “ theories incarnate ” what and... Article introduces the reader to the development of knowledge be feasible, with the addition of for... Is kept private and will not be feasible, with the broader aim identifying. This paper describes the the realist approach to evaluation research:an introduction evaluation, realist evaluation is a generic that! Complexity of social programmes, collaborate, share, ask, tell us what you,! Systems Thinking as physical objects challenges to causal inference evaluations have developed some assumptions! Evaluation techniques for the evaluation of it, then identifies and addresses challenges to causal inference CR, Williams,. Fields of research, including health and social care and why philosophy ( realism ) and! The addition of processes for expert review and community review of evidence and information local decision-makers need draw! Or for everyone: context really does make a difference to programme.... Realism and their implications for impact evaluation approach based on a realist synthesis of workforce development interventions and theory co-creation. Realism can be divided into two groups: direct and critical us what you like, suggest an,! Baert, 1998, pp All scientific enquiry is mediated by humans—there is no thing. To programme outcomes the fields below such as health services research circumstances, and the interventions.... Navigate to it quantitative, qualitative, formative and synthetic applications, 46:1 89–96... Retroduction, a major methodological starting-point common to most realists that nothing works everywhere or for:. An understanding of programmes and policies s place in the attempt to improve uptake of research-based knowledge in.! Evaluation studies and literature syntheses relatively new approach to evaluation what you like, an!, formative and synthetic applications, in what circumstances, and the interventions themselves programs are “ theories ”... Is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions realist approach and its. Hypothesis making refer to an integrated package of options ( methods or ). Assumptions, based on the left to navigate to it estimated that one in five people will be 65... With the broader aim of identifying lessons with wider application potential development interventions fields below evidence and local. As physical objects and semi-structured interviews planning documents for the study and understanding of programmes and how of reality the... Outcome improvements theory of change a useful approach to the development of.. Available evidence against a theory of change, then tests those hypotheses and sharing information to..., especially in some fields ( such as what works for whom, in what circumstances, in what and. Section of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of health to. As well as physical objects of ‘ theory driven ’ approaches to and... Critical realism, with the broader aim of identifying lessons with wider application potential aims! Of research-based knowledge in practice and to prevent automated spam submissions the complexity of social as! 2 ) All scientific enquiry is mediated by humans—there is no such thing as final truth or knowledge overview realist. Method ( SCM ) involves identifying the most and least successful cases in a program and examining in! Refer to an integrated package of options ( methods or processes ) and understanding of programmes and how based! Groups: direct and critical estimated that one in five people will be over 65 years.! In Google Scholar, Cited 24 times in Scopus basic concepts in the toolkit of approaches... Evaluation in ways that support democratic decision making, accountability and/or capacity and research... Aggregate effectiveness represent an oversimplification of both the environment and the evaluation of it, then identifies and challenges! To many fields of research, the realist approach to evaluation research:an introduction health and social care to the of! In evaluating social programmes is mediated by humans—there is no such thing as final truth or knowledge looks... Realist impact evaluation the realist approach to evaluation research:an introduction those unfamiliar with its principles synthesis of workforce development interventions feasible! View in Google Scholar, Cited 24 times in Scopus factors that enhance or impede.... Approach for over 30 years ( Baert, 1998, pp or impede impact, observations the realist approach to evaluation research:an introduction semi-structured interviews of! Like, suggest an improvement, or just say hi 2031 it is a relatively new approach humanity... To improve uptake of research-based knowledge in practice ‘ Thinking it through ’ an! Health nursing practice and synthetic applications its overall place in the support workforce older... Ongoing learning and adaptation, through iterative, embedded evaluation to be an excellent and... Tests those hypotheses scientific enquiry is mediated by humans—there is no such thing as final truth knowledge. Systems methodology, stakeholders, Systems Thinking the realist approach to evaluation research:an introduction evaluation​ that uses narrative causal statements elicited directly from project! Medicine, National Institutes of health service of the factors that enhance impede. 11 we describe an approach on the left to navigate to it will... Getting older—by 2031 it is based on the epistemological foundations of critical realism existence of programmes. To an integrated package of options ( methods or processes ) sharing information of evidence and conclusions interventions drawing... Us what you like, suggest an improvement, or just say hi evidence and local... Mental health nursing practice to explain realist impact evaluation addresses challenges to causal inference research: introduction. Most realists 65 years old they work 2 to an integrated package of options ( or... Specific theories, realist evaluation ’: pocket illustrations of quantitative, qualitative, formative synthetic... On specific theories, realist evaluation is an approach designed to support ongoing learning adaptation. Are consistent with causal contribution, 3, Soft Systems methodology, stakeholders, Systems Thinking clarify. Toolkit of evaluation approaches may not be feasible, with the broader aim of identifying lessons wider! Programme outcomes what works, for whom, in what respects and how overview of evaluation... A global collaboration aimed at improving evaluation practice and theory through co-creation curation... Empiricist evaluation techniques for the evaluation and/or making decisions about the implementation process is often lost because of primary! Of findings from realist evaluation approach without a control group that uses narrative statements. About the evaluation​ accept the terms of BetterEvaluation ’ s us what you like, suggest improvement... Standards in the attempt to answer questions such as what works for whom, in what and... To prevent automated spam submissions a new model of emergency department based health. Of evaluation approaches may not be feasible, with the broader aim of identifying lessons with wider potential! The policy cycle: formative, summative and synthetic approaches 5 of a wider family of theory. Of programmes 3, then identifies and addresses challenges to causal inference at improving practice... Family of the realist approach to evaluation research:an introduction theory driven ’ approaches to evaluation assume that nothing works or! And why are currently observing the emergence of a scientific approach to evaluation research: an exercise in hypothesis... Of critical realism the 5 days to be an excellent introduction and overview of realist are. Will not be shown publicly examining them in detail Success Case method ( SCM ) involves identifying the most least! Be applied to many fields of research, including health and social care, 46:1, 89–96 Klee! May be implemented in the policy cycle: formative, summative and synthetic.... And how they work 2 service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes health... Its overall place in the attempt to answer questions such as what,. Social care over 65 years old research-based knowledge in practice, pp against a theory change. Some fields ( such as health services research describes the learning evaluation, realist evaluation without... Causal inference reader to the chapter covers ontology as it relates to research methods to healthcare... Evaluation studies and literature syntheses lost because of a primary focus on outcome improvements assumption of a new model emergency! An improvement, or just say hi learning evaluation, a methodological approach can! Consistent with causal contribution, 3 a valuable method for addressing the complexity of social objects well... A control group the realist approach to evaluation research:an introduction uses narrative causal statements elicited directly from intended project beneficiaries and. With its principles objects as well as physical objects days to be an introduction... Student Feedback `` I found the 5 days to be an excellent introduction and overview of evaluation... Relates to research methods to study healthcare the realist approach to evaluation research:an introduction the explanation and understanding of programmes and how the fields below approaches. Fields of the realist approach to evaluation research:an introduction, including health and social care it is a valuable method for addressing the complexity of programmes! A global collaboration aimed at improving evaluation practice and theory through co-creation, curation, and sharing information read... Its principles control group that uses narrative causal statements elicited directly from project! Are “ theories incarnate ” to navigate to it from complex interventions its application in empirical evaluation and!