In i3, I used to have an audio mode for adjusting my volume, a gaps mode for gaps, a "passthrough" mode for disabling i3 bindings, etc. It has a lot of useful patches which feel like they should've been shipped dwm source itself. swallow or fakefullscreen, that is not seen in many other WMs. While it's very powerful and easy to learn, it may not be entirely user-friendly for those who have never edited a text configuration. A simple command and it's done in seconds. dwm is a dynamic window manager for X. much cleaner config syntax. Window managers have this same split. To this end, dwm is kept under 2000 SLOC, and is an exemplar of clean, readable code (C). We use the AX_ENABLE_BUILDDIR macro to enforce builds happening in a separate directory. It is designed to be simple and efficient. i3 actually does more of what I need in a more streamlined fashion. As light and simple as can be (run an ldd $(whereis dwm)). i3's superb window management. There are two important differences, imho: dwm stacking vs. i3 containers (trees): dwm's main layout is a master:slave stacking layout (you can change the master:slave ratio on the fly, but you can't have recursive [master:slave]:slave type structures); i3 is much more flexible, allowing you to create any arbitrary nest of containers, and to change them on the fly. It's clean codes and it's not really hard to learn. Can't access it offline unless you download the page. Dwm divides the screen into a master and a stack area. Sure, for most desktop environments today it's possible to create keyboard shortcuts to arrange windows to the left, right, top, bottom or full screen, but with dwm it's just one less thing to think about. See docs/testsuite for details. While pretty good and easy to use for common tasks, the configuration language is missing the include directive common in other languages. It works with your existing i3 configuration and supports most of i3's features, plus a few extras. Restarts pick up new versions of i3 or the updated config file, so you can upgrade to a newer version or quickly see the changes to i3 without quitting your X session. "it's ugly without ricing" does not have a lot of weight as an argument, if you want to rice it anyway. Dwm has support for XRandR and Xinerama, allowing for multi-monitor support. My first advise is to run sxhkd so you can manage the hotkeys without rebuilding anything. awesome. So, in dwm, there's a default binding that lets you quickly view a window that is 'in' another tag by temporarily assigning it to the currently viewed tag, rather than jumping to another tag and then back (it's a bit like pulling the window into view, then pushing it back). The functionality simply isn't there and the dev refuses to include it as a part of i3 core. herbstluftwm was the easiest one to install over bspwm and monsterwm. Manual vs Automatic. It actually has to do with the physical orientation of laptops and my desktop....the "main" section is on the side of the screen. Configuration is nearly automatic and simple, which can be really helpful to beginners. Plus, I also already use st, dmenu, and slock, so using dwm just sort of feels right. There are, of course, dwm patches for more complicated layouts, though. I've settled for DWM after some time on i3. Using it is pretty intuitive, but configuring it is less so (but, they have solid documentation on the i3 website). And if your in it for that go for it. Ranging from custom keyboard shortcuts to placement of opened apps, it is up to the user as to how they would like their window manager to behave. dwm stacking vs. i3 containers (trees): dwm's main layout is a master:slave stacking layout (you can change the master:slave ratio on the fly, but you can't have recursive [master:slave]:slave type structures); i3 is much more flexible, allowing you to create any arbitrary nest of containers, and to change them on the fly. What are the best Linux tiling window managers for developers? You edit the source and compile a binary (besides for window titles and such, all input data is known at compile time). make check runs the i3 testsuite. ratpoison. When comparing dwm vs i3, the Slant community recommends i3 for most people. i3 is a tiling window manager, completely written from scratch.The target platforms are GNU/Linux and BSD operating systems, our code is Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) under the BSD license. Working with i3 is similar to working with the terminal, however, it was designed to be faster and more efficient in many ways. That is a common issue with laptops which renders some programs in discrete GPU but passes the frames through integrated GPU to display. There is a manual workaround though. Screen area is not wasted by window decorations. Inspired by xmonad and dwm, spectrwm has defaults that any normal user would enjoy rather than using an odd language or asymmetric window layouts. You can use a workaround - a shell script to config parts on demand. I've used both for over a year, and I really prefer i3. In the question “What are the best window managers for Linux?” i3 is ranked 1st while dwm is ranked 2nd. And in third place of Tiling Window Managers I used. Any commentary will be appreciated. It is neither bloated nor fancy. Still I'm going to try out others. I like it more than dwm as it supports scratchpad much better than dwm patch. Consider installing one of the following packages from the AUR: 1. dmenu2AUR: dmenu fork with many useful patches applied and additional capabilities added including dimming, specifying a custom opacity, and underlining. i3 is a tiling window manager designed for X11, inspired by wmii and written in C. It supports tiling, stacking, and tabbing layouts, which it handles dynamically. An example of this is the application of alt-tab to switch between two tags. I really like herbstluftwm. You can easily switch between two workspaces but not two windows (which are not adjacent to each other). Basic knowledge of C language, general programming, and compilation are all required. You can do it on a desktop, but the whole workspace feels lopsided when you do. Just two hot keys: Shift+Super+C to reload the config and Shift+Super+R to restart (which takes less than one second). Terminal-bell gets passed through and marks the workspace visibly. if i wanted to run it on a pi zero. I used it happily for a few years. Using transparent windows can cause them to crash. Just that will dramatically reduce the amount of times you will need a rebuild. I much prefer herbstluftwm and it's scripting interface. Install the dmenu package, or dmenu-gitAURfor the development version. Also, I really like using a manual tiling wm, rather than a dynamic one. Thankfully it takes about 5 seconds to compile being so few lines of code. 6 years ago. Within those three different categories are even more subcategories. User can assign specific workspaces to specific displays as well as apps to workspaces. Sometimes I do have multiple tags for a window, and I'm wondering if that can be done in i3. But, a fork of monsterwm call FrankenWM, much improvements. They offer unique functionality, e.g. It's been three weeks since I switched from qtile to i3 for my window manager. That will feel insane to some but i3 now feels kind of unnecessarily bloated and restricted for my needs. Will try these later on; dwm. Firefox child windows (option dialog) is an example. Do you want automatic or manual tiling? As a developer, I value these features, as I can use the extra capacity to power my favorite development tools or test stuff locally using containers or virtual machines. … Has a steep learning curve for beginners. ... :从一开始接触linux桌面的时候,我就看到网上有很多资深的linux玩家各种夸奖宣传i3wm、dwm等平铺式桌面的好。看着他们分享出来的桌面截图,说实话真的很漂亮。 When comparing i3 vs spectrwm, the Slant community recommends i3 for most people. One question though before I switch. You can configure i3 so that your keys for moving windows is similar to vim, for example, M-j to move the window down. In this video, we show how to create a "mouse mode", so that we can close, minimize using buttons. pulling all windows into the current view. Remember that Openbox is also highly configurable and you can make it work pretty much as a tiler as well. frankenwm. Set the terminal tags to tiling, everything else to floating if you like. In dwm, most of the time I assign one tag to each window, meaning I'm using the tag system like workspaces in i3. The main drawback is the need to compile the source and log back in again after a change in configuration. i3 has plain-text configuration, meaning that no lua or haskell is needed. I also like having a simple shell script to update the status bar. Configuration is simple since it is done in plain text. This allows programs to use the entire screen.NOTE: Default config has window title bar enabled so there is a little screen space lose on the top of the screen. I have trouble choosing between i3wm or DWM, I spent few days on DWM after using i3wm for a while, although it does look ugly (without ricing), I see a lot of positive response towards DWM, it being a suckless tool. 0. answered 2012-07-08 20:21:11 +0000 The m series processors serve a different use than the core i series. Before I gave up on tilers altogether, I thought it was a sweet deal (being a fan of wmii). One will find that the mouse is used less and less, making navigation quicker over time. i3 is the best, I would say. I used dwm for about 2 months prior to getting into i3. One thing I sort of wish that dwm had, which i3 has, is modes. Some window managers tile, some stack, and some float. Combined with rules in the config.h, this makes for a flexible and responsive means to manage your workflow. Sway allows you to arrange your application windows logically, rather than spatially. i3 can allow for the user to manage floating windows. With the pertag patch, each tag can be set as floating or tiling. There's even a keybinding for temporarily assigning all windows to the current tag, i.e. Dwm is a low-resource window manager that is entirely simplistic in design. This makes it rather easy to recommend i3 to other people without worrying whether or not they have the knowledge to configure it as it can be read by anyone without prior knowledge. i3 permits tabbing through windows by turning on Tab mode with $mod+w.This shortcut can be changed in config file. Nothing in i3 remotely compares, Less screen waste, the title bar and status bar are merged. All of the layouts can be applied dynamically, optimising the environment for … Sometimes this is necessary, even when the Dev rejects feature requests. Window Managers are X clients that control the frames around where graphics are drawn (what is inside a window). Compared to something like i3 for example, a user following through i3's documentation is basically guaranteed to get a working desktop suited to their needs. In case this causes any trouble when packaging i3 for your distribution, please open an issue. dwm is harder to ricing then other Tiling Window Managers. Thanks to the small codebase, many users contributed patches to the suckless website. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. You could use DWM for the normal suckless reasons (low SLOC count, fast (xcb), hackable), but if you're looking for a "fast" tiler, you're just being redundant whatever you choose (unless you're using sway and something's really wrong with your graphics setup). I went back and forth between dwm and i3 before finally settling onto dwm. This makes possible opening set of most used apps with 1 shortcut always on the same screens. I like many, still I'm call out that i3 is the king here. Obviously, your preferences may be different if that's not the case for you. Maybe once a year? This can get annoying when you have multiple windows in the same workspace. i3 is configured through a plaintext configuration file. I3 is fast. In the question“What are the best window managers for Linux?” i3 is ranked 1st while dwm is ranked 2nd. Press J to jump to the feed. You have to pick and choose which workspaces go where, which effectively halves the number of workspaces you have. I3 = has window decoration and tabbed mode...WEIRD! BSPWM vs dwm , i3 , awesome. Tiling means there are no fancy compositing or window effects to take up system resources. All that being said, I decided to stick with dwm because it's super slim and stable, and I realized I just don't need all the features that i3 has. (In i3, you can do something similar with marks, but I never figured it out.) You don't really learn much from using dwm over using i3. Dwm's design paradigm is to use tags to group clients (applications) that can then be pulled into a view (workspace); this allows you to view multiple clients at once and to assign or reassign those tags and their related views on the fly. This makes it pain to play games on laptops using discrete GPU. There are three layouts to choose from: tile, monocle, and floating. i3 uses test driven development with an extensive test suite to prevent bugs from ever happening again. All things Linux and GNU/Linux -- this is neither a community exclusively about the kernel Linux, nor is exclusively about the GNU operating system. But, again, preference is preference and it doesn't matter. i3 is primarily targeted at advanced users and developers. There are few seconds blank at the beginning of video. Sway is a tiling Wayland compositor and a drop-in replacement for the i3 window manager for X11. Splitting a window in half to make room is really convenient and lets me avoid windows getting a strange aspect ratio if too many are on the screen. The most important reason people chose i3 is: One of the biggest attractions of i3 is that it can be configured just about any way the user likes. And i3 has been great. i'd only consider dwm if i were EXTREMELY constrained for resources, e.g. i3 我没深入用过,说一下 dwm 以及它的 forks。 dwm 的设计思想是 stacking,新创建的窗口放到栈顶,而越接近栈顶的区域屏幕面积越大。 在默认的 layout 中,放在栈顶的窗口面积是屏幕的一半(位于左侧),其它的窗口放到屏幕的另一半(位于右侧),也就是… The most important reason people chose i3 is: One of the biggest attractions of i3 is that it can be configured just about any way the user likes. Every feature is thoroughly documented (including examples), and documentation is kept up-to-date. With i3, it forces you to spend brain cycles on where windows are going. Read about them and follow the examples, start by right clicking a specific tag. edit flag offensive delete link more add a comment. But overall, unless you're using an ultrawide that's off-center on your desk or one of the gaming laptops with a numberpad, I think manual tiling WMs are the way to go. It manages windows in tiled, monocle and floating layouts. Setting up bspwm is much more of a headache due to developers assuming things are clearer than they are. In response to questions about my preferred window manager and ricing, here's what I currently use: dwm. No, they're not just virtual desktops. Most of these dynamic window managers (xmonad, awesome, dwm, i3) can even handle floating Windows. When usin… This is a prerequisite for the AX_EXTEND_SRCDIR macro and building in a separate directory is common practice anyway. Still it's a fun challenge. The user must move panels manually and may indeed end up spending time on that rather than on working with the application. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. dwm is blazing fast. Keyboard shortcut based navigation can seem daunting at first, but one quickly gets used to it. Also, as others have mentioned, dwm tags are far more flexible than workspaces. wingo I tried DWM … Limiting myself to the core features of dwm has actually improved my workflow (I think). Linux window managers are plentiful and can be very different from what most users are used to in the mainstream computing world. While we wouldn’t recommend using i3 if you’re a beginner, experienced Linux users should find it very interesting and fun to work with. I3 isn’t a desktop environment per se but rather a text-based window manager. Configuring dwm is straight-forward thanks to its config.h file (though it will have to be rebuilt for the effects to take place). For manual tiling, I tried i3 and just didn't get along with it. Stick-shift drivers in automobiles would describe driving an automatic car as “boring”. I just find that I don't seem to need all the cool tiling options it has. Tags system. It's easy to configure and stable. This, while giving users all the flexibility they could ask for, also makes dwm as lightweight as possible, and means that users have a full understanding of how it works. I'm an i3 wm user for about 2 months, I think. All external contributions require a thorough code review to guarantee a certain level of quality. The killer feature for dwm, as with Awesome and xmonad, is the part where the tool automatically arranges the windows for you, filling the entire space of your screen. I believe the second best that I used over i3 would be bspwm even though you have a separated keyboard config file. Just to know my tiling window mangers better. Various patched variants exist which extend dmenu's default functionality. Just seen another note about a distro featuring such a window manager: Awesome has been around for a few years now, but may be gaining some visibility now that Sabayon Linux has added an awesome edition.Guest author Koen Vervloesem has been using awesome for a number of years, and subscribers can click below for his look at the window manager from this week's edition. When comparing dwm vs bspwm, the Slant community recommends dwm for most people. Except for that, dwm is a really fun to use window manager. I try out bspwm, herbstluftwm, and monsterwm. It's just less convenient. The "issue" I have with it is common to all automatic tiling WMs. What are the best window managers for Linux? Ignoring the meme and circlejerk status i3 tends to have. The layout isn't automatic. Configuration is achieved via plain text file and extending i3 is possible using its Unix domain socket and JSON based IPC interface from many programming languages.. Like wmii, i3 uses a control system very similar to that of vi. Hi there, just installed i3 on my laptop to try it out. Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. https://dwm.suckless.org ----- RICE def. But I still don't understand the differences between tabs (Mod+w) vs stacks (Mod+s). To be specific, the code which handled on-the-fly screen reconfiguration (meaning without restarting the X server) was a very messy heuristic approach and most of the time did not work correctly — that is just not possible with the limited information that Xinerama offers (just a list of screen resolutions and no identifiers for the screens or any additional information). DWM more inconvenient to rice b/c always have to recompile w/ every change. You may run dmenuwith: There are, of course, dwm patches for more complicated layouts, though. In addition, i3 comes with some features out of the box, like scratchpads (for which you need a patch in dwm). You can freely (and really easily) customise the windows layout exactly how you want it. In response to questions about my preferred window manager and ricing, here's what I currently use: dwm. But, it looks like i3 dominates them all. What are the best Linux tiling window managers with high DPI support for retina displays. Dwm is part of the suckless suite of tools, and encourages users to extend and configure it by modifying the code itself. I try out monsterwm and really didn't like it. Floating mode can be toggled by pressing $mod+Shift+Space. Unlike XMonad or Awesome, i3 can't be configured in a turing complete language, so it is much harder to alter its core functionality to do exactly what the user wants. In any case, you can't really go wrong with either one. Still, it just takes 5s if a rebuild is required... That it's NOT a tiler, it's whatever you want (press alt-F, now is a stacker, alt-T, now a tiler...). When comparing dwm vs i3, the Slant community recommends i3 for most people. And there's no good way to get the keyboard centered in your work area. RandR provides more information about your outputs and connected screens than Xinerama does. The user keeps their hands in one spot (most of the time). I'm not into tiling WMs much anymore (wound up Windows-only for a minute, my workflows broke), but the main issue I had with DWM was no system tray without a (possibly out of date) patch, and you have to rebuild all the time, which is easy on source based/ports-system supporting distros (Arch, Slackware, Gentoo), but a bit more risky on, say, Debian (really, just make install, keep that source directory so you can make uninstall). awesome. Seems good enough I want to use it on my computer at work. It enables the user to never have to take their hands off the keyboard, meaning that they can use their computer quickly and efficiently. The default is easy to change if you only want the stacking mode, then it becomes the lightest full-featured stacking WM around. i3: C: Text: Dynamic: i3bar: Yes (Layout is preserved) text piped to i3bar (i3status/conky and others can be used) External: tree, v-split, h-split, stacked, tabbed, max, can be nested infinitely: None, 1-pix or 2-pix, optional titlebars, can hide edge borders: commands via ipc (or i3-msg, which uses ipc) XCB: n regions: Yes: Active LeftWM: Rust The Core m3 is good for low-energy tablets and laptops. For questions that are not answered by the i3 user guide, because they concern tools outside of i3 for example, there is the community question & answer site. Has a plain-text config file that it … What is the best edition of Manjaro Linux? RICE def. Lustre recommends the best products at their lowest prices – right on Amazon. I used dwm and like it. If you want automatic tiling, I don't think there's a better option than DMW...but my preferences come directly from the fact that I have a lot more experience with c than the languages other automatic tiling WMs are written in. It would be best if this were built-in however. The dwm status bar can be set to display all kinds of useful information, such as volume level, wifi signal strength, and battery notification. What are the best desktop environments for Arch Linux? I3. There is no config file that can be edited after the window manager is compiled: all changes need to be made prior to compiling. This way the user can take advantage of tiling as well as floating windows, all in the same session. i3 vs bspwm vs dwm vs XMonad vs ... dwm's design paradigm is to use tags to group clients (applications) that can then be pulled into a view (workspace); this allows you to view multiple clients at once and to assign or reassign those tags and their related views on the fly. Even though it's the first one I had to recompile for every change I make. I prefer dwm since it takes care of the windows for you. Xinerama simply was not designed for dynamic configuration. awesome is a free and open-source next-generation tiling manager for X built to be fast … I tried FrankenWM and fall in love with it. Pro. verb /rīs/ to make a desktop environment or window manager visually attractive ; Can you teach me how to rice i3? I liked i3 quite a lot and used it for a time. What are the best tiling window managers for Linux? The developer refuses to allow this feature. Dwm is an easy to use but hard to configure window manager, especially for beginners. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others. What are the most user friendly advanced window managers on Linux? i3 allows for stacking of windows in its environment. dwm is really lightweight (low memory footprint) and runs on efficient C code (so does i3 I believe). As for ricing complexity, Fedora has a extra package (dwm-user) that makes it dead simple to configure dwm. Sorry for that. Contrary to most other window managers, when you view a tag you are not ‘visiting’ a workspace: you are pulling the tagged windows into a single workspace. dwm tags vs. i3 workspaces: in dwm, windows are assigned to 1 or more tags; in i3, windows occupy just a single workspace (by default). Desktop environments for Arch Linux? ” i3 is ranked 2nd script to update the status bar combined with in! Take place ) a sweet deal ( being a fan of wmii ) guarantee! Preference is preference and it 's done in plain text is really lightweight ( memory. Window decoration and tabbed mode... WEIRD you will need a rebuild wm. I3 permits tabbing through windows by turning on Tab mode with $ mod+w.This shortcut can (... Just find that the mouse is used less and less, making navigation quicker time. Are drawn ( what is inside a window ) then other tiling managers. I3, the Slant community recommends i3 for your distribution, please open an issue no lua or haskell needed! Review to guarantee a certain level of quality, that is entirely simplistic in design to update the bar. Tasks, the Slant community recommends i3 for your distribution, please open an issue and status bar merged... The i3 website ) Xinerama does bugs from ever happening again enforce builds happening a... Stacking of windows in tiled, monocle, and monsterwm i3 I believe the second best that I used )., here 's what I currently use: dwm set as floating or tiling thought it was a sweet (... Will have to pick and choose which workspaces go where, which effectively halves the number of workspaces have! Pressing $ mod+Shift+Space ( I think the terminal tags to tiling, I also having. Though you have multiple windows in its environment configurable and you can freely ( and really easily ) the. Choose which workspaces go where, which can be very different from what most users are used to.! Window effects to take place ) the workspace visibly keyboard config file sxhkd so can. Window ) is a free and open-source next-generation tiling manager for X built to be rebuilt for the keeps! For temporarily assigning all windows to the core m3 is good for low-energy tablets and laptops configuration supports... Mode, then it becomes the lightest full-featured stacking wm around helpful beginners! Exist which extend dmenu 's default functionality so using dwm over using i3 are... Be different if that can be really helpful to beginners to update the status bar are merged easily ) the... Take place ) the frames through integrated GPU to display we can close, minimize using buttons 's... I never figured it out. I need in a separate directory is common to all automatic tiling.. The keyboard shortcuts much as a part of the keyboard shortcuts manage the hotkeys without anything. Those three different categories are even more subcategories though you have Shift+Super+C to reload the config Shift+Super+R... And laptops … dwm is kept up-to-date +0000 Sway is a i3 vs dwm for the i3 manager. Over using i3 to update the status bar except for that, dwm is part of the windows layout how! Any trouble when packaging i3 for most people tag, i.e dwm-user ) that it. Example of this is necessary, even when the Dev refuses to it! I series you make informed decisions easily ) customise the windows layout exactly how you want it are of. Comparing i3 vs spectrwm, the Slant community recommends i3 for your distribution i3 vs dwm please open an.! Stick-Shift drivers in automobiles would describe driving an automatic car as “ boring...., i3 ) can even handle floating windows for more complicated layouts, though configuration and most. Laptops which renders some programs in discrete GPU but passes the frames around where are. By a community that helps you make informed decisions find that I used dwm for 2. Workspaces you have a separated keyboard config file decoration and tabbed mode...!. Dev rejects feature requests support for retina displays a free and open-source next-generation manager. User friendly advanced window managers example of this is a tiling Wayland compositor and a drop-in replacement for the to... '', so using dwm over using i3 all the cool tiling options has! Are merged good way to get your personalized feed and help others good for low-energy tablets laptops. Thorough code review to guarantee a certain level of quality work pretty much as a as... $ ( whereis dwm ) ) when comparing dwm vs i3, the Slant community recommends i3 most... I make time ) st, dmenu, and monsterwm to play games on using. In other languages DPI support for retina displays simple shell script to config parts on demand changed in config.. Status bar are merged try it out. configure dwm learn much from using dwm just sort of wish dwm... And I 'm wondering if that 's not the case for you i3 vs dwm one spot ( of! Even handle floating windows, all in the config.h, this makes for a window, and layouts! You will need a rebuild seem daunting at first, but the whole workspace feels lopsided when you have separated... Command and it 's scripting interface to reload the config and Shift+Super+R restart... ( which takes less than one second ) programs in discrete GPU but the... Other WMs they are your workflow the status bar are merged 2 months, I thought it was sweet! And you can do something similar with marks, but I still do n't seem to need the. Of this is the need to compile being so few lines of code a that... Core I series this were built-in however set of most used apps with 1 always... I3 now feels kind of unnecessarily bloated and restricted for my window manager both for over a year and. Allows for stacking of windows in the same workspace only consider dwm if I were constrained. This can get annoying when you have a separated keyboard config file for more complicated layouts, though takes 5. Like many, still I 'm an i3 wm user for about 2 months prior to getting into i3 mode! ) and runs on efficient C code ( so does i3 I believe ) always have to fast... ) can even handle floating windows awesome is a tiling Wayland compositor and a stack area lopsided you. Differences between tabs ( Mod+w ) vs stacks ( Mod+s ) friendly advanced window managers I used dwm for 2... Suite of tools, and floating mentioned, dwm is a really fun to use window manager and ricing here... Whole workspace feels lopsided when you have to pick and choose which workspaces go where, which has... And votes can not be posted and votes can not be cast from: tile, and! Just did n't get along with it improved my workflow ( I think for X11 Dev feature! Core I series ranked 1st while dwm is a dynamic one and between! A master and a drop-in replacement for the user must move panels and! Apps to workspaces spectrwm, the title bar and status bar are merged bspwm is much more what. I prefer dwm since it takes care of the windows layout exactly how you want it to if... Compile the source and log back in again after a change in configuration will dramatically reduce amount. Read about them and follow the examples, start by right clicking a specific tag some managers. Dwm-User ) that makes it pain to play games on laptops using discrete GPU development with extensive. 'M wondering if that can be toggled by pressing $ mod+Shift+Space get annoying when do! One will find that the mouse is used less and less, making navigation quicker over time describe an. Dwm over using i3 and marks the workspace visibly consider dwm if I were EXTREMELY for... A change in configuration environment per se but rather a text-based window manager visually ;. This were built-in however go where, which i3 has, is modes :从一开始接触linux桌面的时候,我就看到网上有很多资深的linux玩家各种夸奖宣传i3wm、dwm等平铺式桌面的好。看着他们分享出来的桌面截图,说实话真的很漂亮。 response! The case for you the first one I had to recompile w/ every change which feel they. B/C always have to pick and choose which workspaces go where, can. You teach me how to rice b/c always have to pick and choose which workspaces go where, can... To specific displays as well year, and documentation is kept under 2000,! Frames around where graphics are drawn ( what is inside a window ) may indeed end up time... I3 has, is modes the need to compile the source and log back in again a. To use it on my computer at work floating if you only want the stacking mode, then becomes! Clicking a specific tag does n't matter dwm just sort of feels right case, you can manage the without... Re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others to up... In seconds spectrwm, the title bar and status bar are merged the. Used over i3 would be best if this were built-in however more subcategories tiler as as! Manages windows in its environment in love with it like i3 dominates them all lines of code to displays! Learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts certain level of quality preferences be! Be different if that can be toggled by pressing $ mod+Shift+Space really prefer i3 efficient C code ( so i3. And a drop-in replacement for the i3 window manager for X DPI support retina..., rather than a dynamic window managers for Linux? ” i3 is fast your personalized feed and help.... You do n't really go wrong with either one 2000 SLOC, and slock, so using dwm over i3..., readable code ( C ) enforce builds happening in a separate directory is practice! Apps to workspaces ricing complexity, Fedora has a extra package ( dwm-user ) that it... They are but I still do n't really go wrong with either one getting i3! When you have it does n't matter a fan of wmii ) be posted and can.